Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

13
Posts
7
Votes
Grant Huggins
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Ardmore, OK
7
Votes |
13
Posts

UBIT Taxes in Solo 401k

Grant Huggins
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Ardmore, OK
Posted

Have a Solo 401k that owns a couple of rental properties. Now rehabbing a new property I intend to flip, but discovered the UBIT tax issue. Several references discuss how holding for over a year avoids UBIT. One reference says that if the majority of fund properties are long term rentals and you have an occasional flip, it does not trigger UBIT. Any experience here on this issue?  

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,877
Posts
2,535
Votes
Brian Eastman
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
2,535
Votes |
2,877
Posts
Brian Eastman
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
Replied

@Grant Huggins 

The IRS language is as follows:  If a tax exempt entity engages in a trade or business on a regular or repeated basis, then UBIT applies.

A single flip on rare occasion mixed into a portfolio of largely passive investments would not "likely" be subject to UBTI, with the caveat that the IRS has the final determination should they choose to take a closer look.  A conservative approach would be that if your intent was to flip the property, then UBTI applies.

Holding a property in and of itself does not eliminate UBTI, but just makes you a slow flipper.  Holding the property as a passive rental for a period of time would eliminate teh UBTI exposure.

Loading replies...