Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 10 years ago, 09/09/2014

User Stats

52
Posts
4
Votes
Ron Czecholinski
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Asheville, NC
4
Votes |
52
Posts

Partnering agreement

Ron Czecholinski
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Asheville, NC
Posted

I am partnering with someone to convert a property into a rental. I have a personal mortgage on the property and have had input to keep the deed in my name to avoid potentially activating the due on sale clause. I would appreciate any input on how to best clarify shared equity. Does anyone have experience with structuring an LLC with property equity claims without transferring the deed into the LLC? Are there other options?

User Stats

2,078
Posts
1,810
Votes
Hattie Dizmond
  • Investor
  • Dallas, TX
1,810
Votes |
2,078
Posts
Hattie Dizmond
  • Investor
  • Dallas, TX
Replied

@Ron Czecholinski 

You can use a simple Land Trust, transfer the property to the trust, and name both you and your partner as having beneficial interest in the trust.  Additionally, if the partnership isn't 50/50, you can specify the percentage of beneficial interest you both hold.  As long as you hold a beneficial interest in the Trust, there shouldn't be any issue with the Due on Sale clause.

The other simple option, if it's a 50/50 partnership, is to add your partner to the deed.  That works the same as if you got married and wanted to add your new spouse to the deed on your home.  Again, there is no worry about triggering the Due on Sale clause.  However, the limitation is that this structure would only allow for a 50/50 deal.

Hope that helps.

User Stats

52
Posts
4
Votes
Ron Czecholinski
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Asheville, NC
4
Votes |
52
Posts
Ron Czecholinski
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Asheville, NC
Replied

Thanks Hattie. I heard that land trusts aren't necessarily exempt from the due on sale clause but will look into it more. My current attorney isn't up on creative real estate solutions.

Does anyone know if it is possible to claim equity without changing the deed?

NREIG  logo
NREIG
|
Sponsored
Customizable insurance coverage with a program that’s easy to use Add, edit, and remove properties from your account any time with no minimum-earned premiums.

User Stats

2,078
Posts
1,810
Votes
Hattie Dizmond
  • Investor
  • Dallas, TX
1,810
Votes |
2,078
Posts
Hattie Dizmond
  • Investor
  • Dallas, TX
Replied

@Ron Czecholinski 

What a lot of people try to do is use Trusts to avoid the Due on Sale clause, when they are executing a Subject 2 financing agreement.  You are the actual, original borrower.  Therefore, as long as you are maintaining a beneficial interest in the property, you are free to deed the property over to a trust.  People do it all the time for estate planning and asset protection.  What you've described is less an issue of creative financing than it is simply structuring a business entity.  The Due on Sale clause isn't applicable to the situation you have described, simply because you are not giving up all beneficial interest in the property. 

As for claiming equity without changing the deed, I'm sure your lawyer can structure a document that essentially pledges equity in the property to someone else, without changing the deed.  However, you would be perfectly safe using a trust for this purpose, so there really isn't any reason to over complicate the situation.