The Digital Transformation of Cost Segregation

The Digital Transformation of Cost Segregation

Julio GonzalezPro Member
Specialist · West Palm Beach, FL · Member since 2008 · 4k+ posts · 1k+ votes

Cost segregation has been a major player in tax strategies for real estate owners by reclassifying assets that have a shorter useful life and can be depreciated over 5, 7, and 15 years from the nonresidential or residential properties with a useful life of 39 and 27.5 years, respectively. This accelerates depreciation leading to additional tax savings and cash flow.

Historically, a cost segregation study has been a very manual process completed by tax experts and specialized engineers. However, with new technology, the process of a cost segregation study is being completely transformed. Incorporating technology into the process increases efficiency and precision and allows for deeper insight.

Prior to implementing the new technology, a cost segregation study would require professionals to spend much time going over the architectural blueprints and conducting extremely thorough site visits in order to be able to classify the assets into the correct category. Tax law and engineering expertise was critical. The entire process was quite long and very manual which caused a barrier for investors with smaller properties.

Cost segregation offers many unique benefits including optimizing cash flow, deferring taxes and improving asset management. You’re able to defer taxes by accelerating the depreciation of specific assets which helps reduce your taxable income, thus deferring your tax liability into future years. By reducing your tax liability, this increases your cash flow and extra liquidity you have to reinvest in your real estate portfolio to help create exponential growth. Having the knowledge of the exact value of each asset helps you make better property management decisions such as making decisions on asset disposition, repair or renovations.

So what new technologies are being utilized in this process?

  • Big data analytics: This technology has the ability to dissect and interpret very large databases for renovation and construction costs which would then determine if there are any costs eligible for reclassification or acceleration.
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: AI is able to quickly analyze large amounts of data to identify patterns and in turn make predictions. With training, machine learning may one day be able to classify assets into their respective useful life categories.
  • 3D modeling and BIM Software: These two softwares have already dramatically changed the architectural plan and construction. For cost segregation studies, they are able to provide a deeper dive into the components of a building which helps create more accurate cost allocations.

Why is this beneficial?

  • Much quicker turnaround times
  • Increased accuracy
  • Reduction in costs
  • Can more quickly adapt to changes in the tax code
  • Can be utilized for small or large properties.

While technology and a digital transformation creates efficiencies in the cost segregation study process, a tax expert is still crucial to the process. Professionals are able to utilize the data provided by the technology to use their strategic judgment to incorporate technical findings and provide client-specific recommendations.

Have you considered a cost segregation study? What further questions do you have for me?

3Reply
95 views

Most Popular Reply

Attorney · Worton, MD · Member since 2014 · 274 posts · 195 votes
6mo

Thanks @Christopher Tile - I have spoken with Jonah Wiess at Madison SPECS.  He's terrific, but expertise like that demands a certain price point, and I am working on a $640K commercial property purchase.  I have also worked with Todd Strumper from CIS in the past.  He is also very good.  However, even his more reasonable quote is five times what KBKG will cost for roughly the same estimated short term write offs.

I just don't want to get audited simply because I used an online cost seg.  We are very careful and play by the rules, but an audit even in the best of circumstances sounds like a very time consuming and frustrating process.

See this reply in the discussion

5 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Attorney · Worton, MD · Member since 2014 · 274 posts · 195 votes
    6mo

    @Julio (or anyone reading) - Have you used an automated cost segregation from sites like Segtax, SegStream, or Overline?  Was the result as good or better than one from a traditional cost segregation provider?  Is there any IRS guidance on the legitimacy or any problems with the online services?

    • Accountant · Long Island, NY · Member since 2021 · 184 posts · 148 votes
      6mo
      Quote from @Brian Tome:

      @Julio (or anyone reading) - Have you used an automated cost segregation from sites like Segtax, SegStream, or Overline?  Was the result as good or better than one from a traditional cost segregation provider?  Is there any IRS guidance on the legitimacy or any problems with the online services?


      Hi @Brian Tome

      The automated cost seg sits will provide a cost seg study 1) quicker, 2) cheaper & 3) no in person visit by an engineer. The final cost seg is usually reviewed/signed by engineers, the study is not directly completed by an engineer. So, they are engineer "backed", but not a full engineering study as completed by folks at ETS and Maven for example.

      If we are talking legitimacy, a full engineering methodology aligns with the views of an IRS. They will be safer in larger deals and more defensible in the event of an aggressive audit.

      From results perspective, the automated/online studies will often miss some components when compared against a full field study.

      However, I'm not stating that they are completely to be ignored/wrote off. I see the value in these virtual studies for smaller deals/those who are price sensitive. However, you need to balance the cost/benefit.

      My firm often works with ETS Maven, and Madison SPECS. I'll tag in Sean Graham with Maven, as he's usually active on these forums. He'll be able to speak to the differences better than I can, haha.  Sean, correct me if I misspoke on anything of course. 

  • Attorney · Worton, MD · Member since 2014 · 274 posts · 195 votes
    6mo

    Thanks @Christopher Tile - I have spoken with Jonah Wiess at Madison SPECS.  He's terrific, but expertise like that demands a certain price point, and I am working on a $640K commercial property purchase.  I have also worked with Todd Strumper from CIS in the past.  He is also very good.  However, even his more reasonable quote is five times what KBKG will cost for roughly the same estimated short term write offs.

    I just don't want to get audited simply because I used an online cost seg.  We are very careful and play by the rules, but an audit even in the best of circumstances sounds like a very time consuming and frustrating process.

  • Gian PazziaBusiness Member
    Specialist · Pasadena, CA · Member since 2024 · 38 posts · 15 votes
    6mo

    @Brian Tome 

    Self-guided software can work for small/simple properties under $1.5M. Just make sure you use one from a trusted company with a really good track record under IRS audit over a long period of time. I'm biased here towards the one we own and launched 10 years ago. But there are other tools you can choose from too. With the property values you are considering, you are close to that point where choosing full engineered study vs. self-guided is a matter of how comfortable you and your tax preparer are.

  • Hinton, WV · Member since 2026 · 4 posts · 1 vote
    6mo

    @Julio GonzalezI could not agree with this more. When I paid $2.5k for my first cost segregation study I didn't see anything special about the report that couldn't be translated into code.

    I've done way too much of a deep dive on this. The IRS doesnt actually require a site visit for a cost seg study. The Cost Segregation Audit Techniques Guide lays out several acceptable methodologies and detailed analysis using construction cost data, property records and imagery is one of them. A full engineering study is more defensible under audit sure, but its a spectrum not a pass/fail thing.

    In my experience the DIY/self-guided studies sound great in theory but end up being super time consuming and the output is hard to work with — you're basically doing the classification yourself and hoping you got it right. And honestly even some of the bigger traditional players arent doing proper validation or tracking market trends in their cost allocations. You end up paying $3-5K and getting a study thats based on generic assumptions rather than your actual property. (In particular, They model land costs terribly, and I've seen some 5k reports that have land allocations that will get immediately flagged and audited.)

    The thing to look for in any provider is whether the report has component-level MACRS classification with specific cost allocations tied to your property. Not just "we estimate 30% is short-lived" with no backup wont hold up regardless of who produced it.

    I don't think the top end of the market is going to change, but I think there's a ton of investors in the 200k to 1.5 million range that will absolutely benefit from automated cost segregation studies. 

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.