Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago,

User Stats

33
Posts
9
Votes
Joshua Taffe
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Queens, NY
9
Votes |
33
Posts

STR Loophole Cost Seg

Joshua Taffe
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Queens, NY
Posted

I have a quad w/ 2 units on LTR (1 Unit needs Reno, once a tenant moves out) and 2 units on STR after conducting a cost-seg and using the STR loophole with material participation against my W2 income would the entire structure be used, or just the STR units. Would how would the Renovation come into play with partial asset disposition. The basement is unfinished, how would that come into play if I wanted to finish it and put two basement apartments in it. I know this is a lot but I can't seem to find an answer. Essentially would the cost seg active losses for the 2 STR unit business still be able to be used against the W2 income. Yes assuming all the material participation happens.

Loading replies...