Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

224
Posts
75
Votes
Sean H.
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Pittsburgh, PA
75
Votes |
224
Posts

Issues with using Non-Accredited private investors

Sean H.
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Pittsburgh, PA
Posted

I am speaking with my attorney who is helping me setup the proper documentation for use with private investors. She is suggesting that I do not deal with non-accredited investors because if something should happen to them and they need their money back, they could sue me and claim that they should not have invested in the deal but did anyway because they didn't know any better. She feels that the disclosure documents that would be required for me to use a non-accredited investor would be too onerous for the type of financing I am seeking.

My strategy is to use private money for a one year term to acquire/rehab a rental property priced under $100k, then refinance to a conventional lender after that term.

I am kind of stuck here, as most of my potential private lenders have money sitting idle they want to invest, but do not meet the accredited investor threshold.

Has anyone had this sort of risk come up and how have you dealt with it? Is everyone who is using private money only using accredited investors?

  • Sean H.
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    2,284
    Posts
    6,908
    Votes
    Brian Burke
    #1 Multi-Family and Apartment Investing Contributor
    • Investor
    • Santa Rosa, CA
    6,908
    Votes |
    2,284
    Posts
    Brian Burke
    #1 Multi-Family and Apartment Investing Contributor
    • Investor
    • Santa Rosa, CA
    Replied

    Using a non-accredited investor adds an additional layer of risk. You have to mitigate that risk. Will the loan-to-value ratio be 70% or less? Will there be an appraisal? Lenders policy of title insurance? Does the investor have hard money lending or real estate experience?

    If you do this deal with a non-accredited investor, you aren't heading straight to jail. If you make money, your investor makes money, and your investor gets their money back, you are fine. The $&!? hits the fan when the deal goes south and the investor loses money. Now it's game on, and you have to defend what you did. You need as many facts in your favor as possible. If you can answer yes to the questions in the previous paragraph, you still don't have a get-out-of-jail-free card, but you are defending your actions from a safer position.

    Your securities attorney is giving you good advice if your objective is to minimize your own risk. Business is about taking calculated risks, and perhaps the additional risk of using non-accredited investors is acceptable to you in exchange for the opportunity of doing this deal. Only you have that answer.

    Loading replies...