Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 13 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,029
Posts
380
Votes
Jake Kucheck
  • Residential Real Estate Agent
  • Costa Mesa, CA
380
Votes |
1,029
Posts

Trustee Sale Financing

Jake Kucheck
  • Residential Real Estate Agent
  • Costa Mesa, CA
Posted

So I've started to see this model pop up, usually with particularly poor execution. The underlying question is fairly simple:

If you as an investor had an opportunity to purchase with leverage at "courthouse steps" auctions, would that be useful?

If so, what is the "ceiling" in terms of fees that you would want to pay to acquire a property with 70% LTV financing?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,688
Posts
3,430
Votes
Chris Martin
  • Investor
  • Willow Spring, NC
3,430
Votes |
5,688
Posts
Chris Martin
  • Investor
  • Willow Spring, NC
Replied

For an investor it may be useful, but I think the premise is faulty. For sure, conventional lenders are out at virtually any LTV. Private lenders? At 70% LTV? In general for courthouse sales, you can't get an accurate assessment of property condition, so calculating repair costs is guess work at best. To be reasonably accurate, you are limited to a small percentage of properties going to the courthouse where you can gain access and are priced to be profitable. Not impossible, but difficult. That means targets are like: tenant occupied property, friendly OO property (very very small numbers here), "accessible" (did I really say that?) property, some condos, or neighbors with a key (would you trade my $50 bill for a 5 minute walk-through?, etc). Remember, the property is at the courthouse for a reason. A private lender will (or should) make you find it. Owner couldn't sell, right? Oh, kitchen fire. Or the "owner" was 3 85 lb. dogs. I don't know any lenders who would do 70% LTV on a sight unseen property, unless maybe 25 points upfront?

A better answer may be to substitute collateral, do your best "due diligence", buy with a plan for the worst and hope for the best, 'free clean' the place up, then finance and back fill the collateralized asset.

Loading replies...