Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago, 01/31/2017

User Stats

24
Posts
3
Votes
Trentan Moore
  • Hollidaysburg, PA
3
Votes |
24
Posts

FHA (2-4 unit) Question/Recommendation

Trentan Moore
  • Hollidaysburg, PA
Posted

Hi Guys,

My business partner and I are looking to take advantage of the low money down option of using an FHA loan to purchase a 2-4 unit property in the Pittsburg area. I would be the owner occupied resident that has to live there for 1 year. As we were going through the pre-approval process my lender informs me that FHA requirements are to put 25% down. This completely contradicted everything I have read/researched about FHA as a house hacking investment strategy.

I was wondering if anyone could clarify this and was also looking for a recommendation for an investor friendly lender in the Pittsburgh Area so we could get a second opinion.

Thanks

User Stats

122
Posts
45
Votes
Clayton Plank
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Jacksonville, FL
45
Votes |
122
Posts
Clayton Plank
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Jacksonville, FL
Replied

@Trentan Moore how have you structured your business partner into the deal? The bank requiring that amount down looks like they feel this is an investment property and not the regular owner occupied requirements.

  • Clayton Plank
  • User Stats

    24
    Posts
    3
    Votes
    Trentan Moore
    • Hollidaysburg, PA
    3
    Votes |
    24
    Posts
    Trentan Moore
    • Hollidaysburg, PA
    Replied

    @Clayton Plank thanks that could be the problem. I am pretty sure it was structured both as "co-borrowers". We originally wanted to both be on the loan so we use both incomes to increase our purchasing limit. Is there any way to structure it that way and be able to qualify for the 3.5% down? Maybe as a co-signer?

    CLOSED Title logo
    CLOSED Title
    |
    Sponsored
    CLOSED Title is the Investor Friendly Title Company CLOSED Title, founded by real estate investors. Double closings, assignments, we do it all.

    User Stats

    2,080
    Posts
    898
    Votes
    Shawn Mcenteer
    Agent
    • Realtor
    • Boonton Township, NJ
    898
    Votes |
    2,080
    Posts
    Shawn Mcenteer
    Agent
    • Realtor
    • Boonton Township, NJ
    Replied

    with FHA one of the main perks is your ability to put little down, less then 5%. I think the reason your lender is requiring 25% down is because you are getting preapproved with a business partner which may skew the lending requirements. Lenders are not as lenient when approving partners. My understanding is these lending privileges are done to encourage first time home buyers to buy.

    • Shawn Mcenteer
    • 9739753895
    business profile image
    Living In North Jersey
    5.0 stars
    28 Reviews

    User Stats

    122
    Posts
    45
    Votes
    Clayton Plank
    Pro Member
    • Investor
    • Jacksonville, FL
    45
    Votes |
    122
    Posts
    Clayton Plank
    Pro Member
    • Investor
    • Jacksonville, FL
    Replied

    @Trentan Moore it is my understanding that a co-signer is only signing for your approved values. Not like a co-borrower which increases your values.

  • Clayton Plank
  • User Stats

    7,889
    Posts
    6,286
    Votes
    Andrew Postell
    Lender
    Pro Member
    #1 Creative Real Estate Financing Contributor
    • Lender
    • Fort Worth, TX
    6,286
    Votes |
    7,889
    Posts
    Andrew Postell
    Lender
    Pro Member
    #1 Creative Real Estate Financing Contributor
    • Lender
    • Fort Worth, TX
    Replied

    @Trentan Moore based off what you stated it sounds like you need to remove your business partner from the transaction.  Is that possible for you to do that?  If there are two or more borrowers but one or more will not occupy the property as his/her principal residence, the maximum mortgage is limited to 75% LTV - that is directly from the FHA handbook. The exception here is that if your business partner is related to you by blood (as long as they are not selling you the house as well)

    • Andrew Postell
    business profile image
    Andrew Postell - Guaranteed Rate
    5.0 stars
    38 Reviews

    User Stats

    24
    Posts
    3
    Votes
    Trentan Moore
    • Hollidaysburg, PA
    3
    Votes |
    24
    Posts
    Trentan Moore
    • Hollidaysburg, PA
    Replied

    @Andrew Postell Yes, that explains it, Thank you! Also just found this article

    https://www.fha.com/fha_article?id=513 . I was hoping it could be done as co-borrowers so it could increase our limit, but I guess that would eliminate the 3.5% down. I will have to see what I qualify for as an individual borrower.

    User Stats

    7,889
    Posts
    6,286
    Votes
    Andrew Postell
    Lender
    Pro Member
    #1 Creative Real Estate Financing Contributor
    • Lender
    • Fort Worth, TX
    6,286
    Votes |
    7,889
    Posts
    Andrew Postell
    Lender
    Pro Member
    #1 Creative Real Estate Financing Contributor
    • Lender
    • Fort Worth, TX
    Replied

    @Trentan Moore glad we found the cause.  I'll keep my fingers crossed for you that you can still get the deal going.  Good luck!

    • Andrew Postell
    business profile image
    Andrew Postell - Guaranteed Rate
    5.0 stars
    38 Reviews

    User Stats

    1,141
    Posts
    602
    Votes
    Stephanie Medellin
    • Mortgage Broker
    • California
    602
    Votes |
    1,141
    Posts
    Stephanie Medellin
    • Mortgage Broker
    • California
    Replied

    @Trentan Moore  You have a non-occupant co-borrower on a 2-4 unit building - that's why there is a 25% down requirement.  You will get the same answer from any lender you ask (unless the loan officer isn't aware of the guideline, in which case you won't find out until you get a denial by underwriting when they catch it!)

    User Stats

    2,166
    Posts
    1,435
    Votes
    Albert Bui
    Pro Member
    • Lender
    • Bellevue WA & Orange County, CA
    1,435
    Votes |
    2,166
    Posts
    Albert Bui
    Pro Member
    • Lender
    • Bellevue WA & Orange County, CA
    Replied
    Originally posted by @Trentan Moore:

    Hi Guys,

    My business partner and I are looking to take advantage of the low money down option of using an FHA loan to purchase a 2-4 unit property in the Pittsburg area. I would be the owner occupied resident that has to live there for 1 year. As we were going through the pre-approval process my lender informs me that FHA requirements are to put 25% down. This completely contradicted everything I have read/researched about FHA as a house hacking investment strategy.

    I was wondering if anyone could clarify this and was also looking for a recommendation for an investor friendly lender in the Pittsburgh Area so we could get a second opinion.

    Thanks

    Stephanie is right about why you have been requested to bring in 25% down payment. Typically FHa is 3.5% down but because you brought in an non occupant coborrower you've triggered a clause within FHA that requires you to bring in 25% down which thereby defeats the whole purpose of using FHA. If you had to put 25% down you mind as well go conventional.

    This basically tells me your lender has not done a very good job of walking you through the pros and cons of each option. He/she should say hey look here dont bring in the non occupant borrower because youre required min down will go from 3.5% down to 25% down and give you some alternative options.

  • Albert Bui
  • User Stats

    2,166
    Posts
    1,435
    Votes
    Albert Bui
    Pro Member
    • Lender
    • Bellevue WA & Orange County, CA
    1,435
    Votes |
    2,166
    Posts
    Albert Bui
    Pro Member
    • Lender
    • Bellevue WA & Orange County, CA
    Replied
    Originally posted by @Trentan Moore:

    Hi Guys,

    My business partner and I are looking to take advantage of the low money down option of using an FHA loan to purchase a 2-4 unit property in the Pittsburg area. I would be the owner occupied resident that has to live there for 1 year. As we were going through the pre-approval process my lender informs me that FHA requirements are to put 25% down. This completely contradicted everything I have read/researched about FHA as a house hacking investment strategy.

    I was wondering if anyone could clarify this and was also looking for a recommendation for an investor friendly lender in the Pittsburgh Area so we could get a second opinion.

    Thanks

    You may want to run through the other requirements when using FHA for this house hacking strategy as well:

    - does the property meet self sufficiency rules of gross rents X 75% - PITIA => 0 ? (only applies on 3-4 units)

    - do you have 3 months cash reserves after down payment and closing costs (unless if you're getting a huge lender credit to pay all your costs) - only applies on 3-4 unit properties

    - health and safety issues on the property? (applies to all FHA Collateral)

  • Albert Bui
  • User Stats

    24
    Posts
    3
    Votes
    Trentan Moore
    • Hollidaysburg, PA
    3
    Votes |
    24
    Posts
    Trentan Moore
    • Hollidaysburg, PA
    Replied

    @Albert Bui so you're saying gross rents X 75%-PITIA has to be over 0 to qualify for FHA loan? This seems near impossible since its a low down payment and PMI is applied. Only applied to 3-4 units? Also does this include the rent for the unit you live in?

    User Stats

    2,166
    Posts
    1,435
    Votes
    Albert Bui
    Pro Member
    • Lender
    • Bellevue WA & Orange County, CA
    1,435
    Votes |
    2,166
    Posts
    Albert Bui
    Pro Member
    • Lender
    • Bellevue WA & Orange County, CA
    Replied
    Originally posted by @Trentan Moore:

    @Albert Bui so you're saying gross rents X 75%-PITIA has to be over 0 to qualify for FHA loan? This seems near impossible since its a low down payment and PMI is applied. Only applied to 3-4 units? Also does this include the rent for the unit you live in?

    This self sufficiency(SS) rule from FHA only applies to 3-4 unit properties and yes you use rents from all 4 units to satisfy this rule, but not to calculate income. Its important to understand the difference between these two facets.

    The SS rule is not for income calculation its only to satisfy the rule itself. The real income calculation uses only rents from 3 out 4 units (assuming a fourplex, or 2 out of 3 assuming triplex).

    So for rental income calculation we'd use 3 units current rents today X 75%  to add to your qualifying income.

  • Albert Bui
  • BiggerPockets logo
    BiggerPockets
    |
    Sponsored
    Find an investor-friendly agent in your market TODAY Get matched with our network of trusted, local, investor friendly agents in under 2 minutes

    User Stats

    24
    Posts
    3
    Votes
    Trentan Moore
    • Hollidaysburg, PA
    3
    Votes |
    24
    Posts
    Trentan Moore
    • Hollidaysburg, PA
    Replied

    @Albert Bui thanks. I found this helpful spreadsheet on BP regarding this rule. https://www.biggerpockets.com/files/user/logdog/fi...

    Looks like it's an 85% self sufficiency rule in Pennsylvania? (which should make things easier to qualify)

    User Stats

    2,166
    Posts
    1,435
    Votes
    Albert Bui
    Pro Member
    • Lender
    • Bellevue WA & Orange County, CA
    1,435
    Votes |
    2,166
    Posts
    Albert Bui
    Pro Member
    • Lender
    • Bellevue WA & Orange County, CA
    Replied
    Originally posted by @Trentan Moore:

    @Albert Bui thanks. I found this helpful spreadsheet on BP regarding this rule. https://www.biggerpockets.com/files/user/logdog/fi...

    Looks like it's an 85% self sufficiency rule in Pennsylvania? (which should make things easier to qualify)

    It changes all the time. The last FHA fourplex i funded was in Mar 2016 and at that time I thought it was still 100% of gross rents of all units had to be => than PITIA (prior rule before it changed), but the underwriter showed me an exerpt that required 75% of gross rents. Luckily this deal met the 1% or greater rule so this 25% discount on my rents was not an impediment to the qualification of that particular loan.

    So could they use 85% or 75% depends on where the guideline is at today but to my knowledge its currently a 75% requirement. 

    Sometimes guidelines change but underwriters still use old rules and the borrower in that instance gets away because of the ignorance of the underwriter (borrower win, originating bank losses).

  • Albert Bui
  • User Stats

    1,953
    Posts
    568
    Votes
    Joseph Scorese
    Lender
    Pro Member
    • Banker
    • Philadelphia
    568
    Votes |
    1,953
    Posts
    Joseph Scorese
    Lender
    Pro Member
    • Banker
    • Philadelphia
    Replied

    Hi @,

    Welcome to BP!

    3.5% Down Payment Minimum

    Up to 6% Seller Assist toward closing costs

    Lender Credit Allowance with Direct Lender

    Gift Monies from family Members Allowed and must be trailed

    Min. 620 Credit Score and W-2 with most lending institutions

    PMI for 1-4 Units and it is permanent unless you refinance into a conventional loan with enough equity (PMI charge has recently dropped .50%)

    FHA Lenders do not have to be Local it is a National Product.

    Pittsburgh is an excellent market to House Hack 3 or 4 Unit Property for owner occupied.

    Let me know if you have any questions.

    Regards,

    Joe Scorese

    • Joseph Scorese

    User Stats

    24
    Posts
    3
    Votes
    Trentan Moore
    • Hollidaysburg, PA
    3
    Votes |
    24
    Posts
    Trentan Moore
    • Hollidaysburg, PA
    Replied

    @Albert Bui Ok thanks for the help. Judging by what I am seeing in the Pittsburgh market, I don't think I should have a problem qualifying under that requirement.

    @Joseph Scorese Hopefully I can find a lender in the Pittsburgh area that is helpful enough to walk me through all those requirements. You are saying I can find a lender outside of that area if needed? Will it still close as easily? 

    User Stats

    1,953
    Posts
    568
    Votes
    Joseph Scorese
    Lender
    Pro Member
    • Banker
    • Philadelphia
    568
    Votes |
    1,953
    Posts
    Joseph Scorese
    Lender
    Pro Member
    • Banker
    • Philadelphia
    Replied

    @Trentan Moore - FHA is a Govt National Program. It is boiler plate. The appraisers are regulated and the forms are regulated. You can go to anyone experienced in FHA.

    Regards, Joe Scorese

    • Joseph Scorese

    User Stats

    591
    Posts
    414
    Votes
    William C.
    • Real Estate Agent
    • Souderton, PA
    414
    Votes |
    591
    Posts
    William C.
    • Real Estate Agent
    • Souderton, PA
    Replied

    Something isn't right. Iv seen this done before with 3.5%. I don't know all the specifics so I can't so where it went wrong, but feel free to reach out to me if you still need help. There are also other loan products available that require even less than FHA.

    User Stats

    2
    Posts
    0
    Votes
    Issac Lee
    • Fresno, CA
    0
    Votes |
    2
    Posts
    Issac Lee
    • Fresno, CA
    Replied
    Originally posted by @Albert Bui:
    Originally posted by @Trentan Moore:

    Hi Guys,

    My business partner and I are looking to take advantage of the low money down option of using an FHA loan to purchase a 2-4 unit property in the Pittsburg area. I would be the owner occupied resident that has to live there for 1 year. As we were going through the pre-approval process my lender informs me that FHA requirements are to put 25% down. This completely contradicted everything I have read/researched about FHA as a house hacking investment strategy.

    I was wondering if anyone could clarify this and was also looking for a recommendation for an investor friendly lender in the Pittsburgh Area so we could get a second opinion.

    Thanks

    Stephanie is right about why you have been requested to bring in 25% down payment. Typically FHa is 3.5% down but because you brought in an non occupant coborrower you've triggered a clause within FHA that requires you to bring in 25% down which thereby defeats the whole purpose of using FHA. If you had to put 25% down you mind as well go conventional.

    This basically tells me your lender has not done a very good job of walking you through the pros and cons of each option. He/she should say hey look here dont bring in the non occupant borrower because youre required min down will go from 3.5% down to 25% down and give you some alternative options.

    @ALBERT BUI

    Hi @Albert Bui, can I do FHA 3.5% with my sister as a co-borrower who is a non-occupant on a 2-4 plex? I have seen a couple of posters as well as my lender say that I can't do this, but I cannot find it anywhere on HUD website that says I can't.

    https://www.fha.com/fha_article?id=513

    My lender said for my situation, I only qualify for a single family residential at 3.5% FHA and not a 2-4 unit dwelling. I looked at the HUD website and found their definition for single family as 1 to 4 units dwelling. I'm confused. Hoping for some clarity. Thank you.

    @Chris Mason

    User Stats

    2
    Posts
    0
    Votes
    Issac Lee
    • Fresno, CA
    0
    Votes |
    2
    Posts
    Issac Lee
    • Fresno, CA
    Replied

    @Albert Bui

    @Stephanie Medellin

    Thanks!

    User Stats

    2,166
    Posts
    1,435
    Votes
    Albert Bui
    Pro Member
    • Lender
    • Bellevue WA & Orange County, CA
    1,435
    Votes |
    2,166
    Posts
    Albert Bui
    Pro Member
    • Lender
    • Bellevue WA & Orange County, CA
    Replied
    Originally posted by @Issac Lee:

    Yes you can but as you may know from reading above is that if you bring in a non owner occupant borrower into a 2-4 unit fha 3.5% down transaction you in essence increase your required down from 3.5% up to 25% thereby defeating the main incentive to use fha in the first place (low down - main incentive).

  • Albert Bui
  • User Stats

    1,141
    Posts
    602
    Votes
    Stephanie Medellin
    • Mortgage Broker
    • California
    602
    Votes |
    1,141
    Posts
    Stephanie Medellin
    • Mortgage Broker
    • California
    Replied

    @Issac Lee @Albert Bui is right.  Any time you have a non-occupant co-borrower on the loan for a 2-4 unit, immediate family or not, the rule changes to 25% down.  

    fha.com is not an official website.

    hud.gov is the correct site for up-to-date, accurate information.

    Baselane logo
    Baselane
    |
    Sponsored
    Baselane is the Ultimate All-In-One Banking Platform for REI Built with integrated rent collection & bookkeeping to save time so you can grow your RE business.