Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

33
Posts
14
Votes
Erik Trefzger
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
14
Votes |
33
Posts

Does Seller Financing Count Against Fannie's Limit?

Erik Trefzger
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
Posted

I've browsed through the forums and wasn't able to find anything on this, but I'm sure other people have this same question. I own 6 properties all financed with conventional 30 year mortgages. I'm considering adding a seller financed property to my portfolio, but I would also like to max out the 10 Fannie Mae backed mortgages as well.

I know that if you buy a property using seller financing it doesn't show up on your credit score, but the rental income will show up on your tax returns. When I apply for a mortgage, the bank looks at the last two tax returns of mine, and they also want to know how many properties and mortgages I have. Even if the private mortgage isn't showing up on my credit score, what would I tell the bank regarding the seller financed property? Here is the issue as I understand it:

1. Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac count the total number of mortgaged properties against your 10 property limit, not just Fannie/Freddie backed loans.

2. I am not at the 10 property limit yet, and would like to have 10 cheap, low interest mortgages on my books before taking on higher interest debt.

3. I don't see how I can add a private mortgage to my portfolio and not have it count against my limit, thus reducing the number of Fannie/Freddie loans I can get by one.

4. Should I just wait until I hit the 10 property limit before pursuing any seller financed deal?

Have any mortgage brokers out there run into this?

Thanks,

Erik

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,126
Posts
2,639
Votes
Matt Devincenzo
  • Investor
  • Clairemont, CA
2,639
Votes |
3,126
Posts
Matt Devincenzo
  • Investor
  • Clairemont, CA
Replied

@Erik Trefzger I think you've gotten your answer to whether this will count toward your total Fannie/Freddie limit or not. So my question back to you is what is the benefit of getting the seller financing for you? Lower down payment, unfinanceable condition, high DTI, low reserves...?

What I'm getting at is there may be another reason to go with the SF route right now other than to get over the 10 loan limit. If that is the case there is a way that this could still be beneficial longer term.

Let's say that you can get this property for only 10% down and that is the "reason" to choose SF over the conventional loan. Now yes it counts against you, but you got your low DP benefit but it's a higher rate which is its "negative". You can buy with SF wait out some appreciation and principal pay down, get the income shown coming in ect. Now you can rate and term refi into a conventional loan with a lower rate and not have to actually put the 25-30% down. They will be basing your loan on the appraised value, not your purchase price which could mean on paper your are financed at 75% LTV when in reality you only have your original 10% down actually in the deal.

So there could still be a reason to go with the SF now even though you haven't hit your 10 financed property limit.

Loading replies...