Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago, 05/17/2020

User Stats

452
Posts
672
Votes
Scott Passman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Batavia, IL
672
Votes |
452
Posts

BREAKING NEWS: You’re not an idiot for using less leverage

Scott Passman
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Batavia, IL
Posted

Alright, so it might not be "breaking news" but it's news to some. So many of the threads and forums I've read since joining BP in 2018 have pushed the power of leverage and maintaining a high LTV to boost your ROI and grow your portfolio faster. There is a faction of investors on here that have steadily urged caution and cited the risks vs rewards of leveraging up properties without adequate reserves, but in my observation they have been in the minority.

While I’ve always erred much more on the conservative side, when refinancing recently I struggled with the decision of whether or not to pull out as much as equity as I can and leave 20% down or stay more conservative to enhance cash flow and keep my leverage down. After running a lot of numbers, I ultimately decided to be more conservative and keep 30% equity in the property and use the cash out money primarily for additional reserves. The most recent turn of events has further affirmed that decision by giving me more long-term flexibility.

Now, I am seeing a lot fewer people on here advising people to max out LTV and many of the "conservative" investors are looking like RE oracles right about now. When I discussed my decision not to maximize my cash out at my last RE meet up, I was surprised by how peppered I was with remarks about missing out an opportunity to cash out my equity to buy more and the insinuations that I'd made a rookie mistake. While there are good reasons for and against higher leverage, this time serves as yet another good reminder of the importance of risk mitigation and reserves.

The downside of lower leverage is it decreases your return and slows down growth. The downside of high leverage is that you could grow too fast and lose your investment(s). I like the former more than the latter. We’ll see what changes come about in real estate on the other side of this pandemic, but hopefully investors as a whole will see how quickly unexpected events can occur at any time and put a little more importance on reserves and financial flexibility. You can’t thrive if you can’t survive.

Loading replies...