Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

367
Posts
189
Votes
Jeff G.
  • Investor
  • Wethersfield, CT
189
Votes |
367
Posts

Things I Don't Understand About Lease Options...

Jeff G.
  • Investor
  • Wethersfield, CT
Posted

So, all of a sudden I'm hearing a lot about Lease Options again. I thought these things were basically eliminated as a viable investment strategy when Dodd-Frank was enacted. 

Apparently I was wrong, so naturally I have some questions:

1. I thought Dodd-Frank (or possibly the Safe Act) handicapped Lease Options severely by setting the yearly maximum to some low figure like 3 per year. I'm hearing you can legally get around this limitation by doing no more than 3 Lease Options inside a single entity such as an LLC and then spawning a new one to hold your next three deals, etc. Is that accurate?

2. It's my understanding that, historically, Lease Options had a high failure rate. That is, the tenant-buyer would often not have good enough credit to buy the house at the end of the lease or the buyer falls on hard times and leaves/is evicted. 

I love making a buck the same as anyone else. However, I am not going to set a tenant buyer up to fail in the process. Is that perception accurate? If so, how do you mitigate these things in a way that is fair to you (profit is made) and gives the buyer has a high (lets say, >80%) of success all things being equal?

3. What are the actual down sides of doing lease options? What can go sideways that tend not to get addressed?

Of course, before doing anything unfamiliar in real estate I'll talk to a good Real Estate lawyer and cover my backside. I just want to get a sense of what BP has to say on the subject.

Oh, and what is the difference between a Lease Option and a Sandwich Lease Option?

  • Jeff G.
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    991
    Posts
    781
    Votes
    Christine Kankowski
    • Real Estate Agent
    • Temecula, CA
    781
    Votes |
    991
    Posts
    Christine Kankowski
    • Real Estate Agent
    • Temecula, CA
    Replied

    I sold my personal house this way.  Buyers didn't have access to cash for about a year but knew they wanted it.  They have a big non-refundable deposit, paid rent, and handled repairs for the year.

    We agreed on a price up front which ended up being good for them, since the market really spiked that hear in san diego, but we were happy that the deal was done.  If they had backed out we had the non-refundable deposit and would have gotten a higher price, but we were happy with the deal .  It worked for all parties.   Buyers Agent did not get paid until purchase was complete. ( I was the agent on my side)

    Loading replies...