Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

214
Posts
107
Votes
Craig H.
  • Cincinnati, OH
107
Votes |
214
Posts

Should I close on time or push it back?

Craig H.
  • Cincinnati, OH
Posted

I am set to close on a 4 unit building on 9/22. As part of the contract the current owner had a list of items that needed to be done prior to closing (i.e. updating breakers, cleaning out basement, removing car w/ flat tire from driveway, cutting down three trees) all of which were done, but the trees. The owner of the building is a linesman and travels to areas affected by natural disasters to restore power etc. So he is headed down to Florida right now.  We're located in Cincinnati. He is not sure if he will have the three trees cut down before the 22nd.  So would you push back the closing till the trees are cut down? Or would you still close on the 22nd, but have a document signed stating the owner has x number of days after closing to remove trees, any damage to property would be paid by them, and $12,000 would be held in escrow for this. If trees aren't removed in x number of days I can do the work and pay for it out of these funds. What do you all think? Thanks for any feedback!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

94
Posts
78
Votes
Jeff Stephens
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Portland, OR
78
Votes |
94
Posts
Jeff Stephens
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Portland, OR
Replied

Craig--

One question: is this a traditional transaction with real estate agents involved? I just ask because if so, you have them, their companies, licenses and insurance to help make sure this gets followed through on by the seller; if not, and you're just buying directly from the seller with no agents, you're obviously more on your own to enforce.

Overall, I like your idea of holding the $12k in escrow (assuming that's a reasonable cost for this tree removal), so that the seller doesn't get those proceeds until he performs.  If there were more remaining unfinished items than just this on the repair addendum, I'd probably lean toward pushing closing back.  But given that it's just the trees, I think your hold-back plan is a good one.

That's my two cents...good luck!

JWS

  • Jeff Stephens
  • [email protected]
  • Loading replies...