Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

9
Posts
0
Votes
Ryne Ray
  • Garland, TX
0
Votes |
9
Posts

Cap Ex Single Family

Ryne Ray
  • Garland, TX
Posted

Hey there everyone! Trigger-shy newbie investor here. I have been a long time lurker here on biggerpockets and thought I would share my biggest roadblock to investing in that first deal. Maybe you all can help get me over it, as I imagine some others may have the same fears. 

For a long time I have been analyzing buy and hold deals with 8% vacancy, 8% property management, $1000/year in repairs, insurance, property taxes, and of course mortgage. I thought these to be conservative numbers. I had no problem finding houses in my area that were in safe neighborhoods, and had good potential for appreciation. These houses also gave off a tiny bit of cash flow or broke even after all my "conservative" numbers. 

However! I recently read an article on the bigger pockets blog by a well respected/accomplished investor, talking about capex numbers that just destroyed any potential deal I look at. It was suggested that on buy and hold properties you would need to set aside $3088 a year for capex. When plugging in these numbers, I cannot find any way to break even or make positive cash flow short of buying the house all cash or putting 40-50+% down. 

Now this article was to steer people away from the 30k houses in the rust belt. However I can run numbers anywhere in the country at any price point and they just don't make sense. 

My question simply is this. Are these realistic numbers? Am I missing something? Is this just the market we are in. I know I want to get in to real estate as my retirement vehicle one way or another, so I will put more down on a mortgage to make it cash flow if I have to. Obviously I would just rather not. Any insight would be greatly appreciated. Hopefully there are some others that can learn from the wisdom you guys will no doubt lay on me. 

Thanks in advance!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,639
Posts
955
Votes
Chris T.
  • Investor
  • Downers Grove, IL
955
Votes |
1,639
Posts
Chris T.
  • Investor
  • Downers Grove, IL
Replied

@Ryne Ray

It depends a lot on the condition of the house and the type of tenants you're putting in.

If you replace the big item expenses when you buy the house, your CAPEX (in theory) budget can be lower. If you plan to hold the property for a while, eventually you will be hit with a major expense.

But these are all projections and budgeting. Another conservative way to look at expenses is to take 50% operating expenses of your rental income. (it's usually applicable to MF but you could use it for SFH; again it's all projections)

Here're a couple of excellent blogs from Andrew

The Top 8 Real Estate Calculations Every Investor Should Memorize

Put to the Test: Are the 2%, 50% & 70% Rules REALLY Useful to Investors?

And of course from Brandon

The Ultimate Guide to Analyzing Rental Properties

Loading replies...