Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 10 years ago,

User Stats

17,995
Posts
17,192
Votes
J Scott
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
17,192
Votes |
17,995
Posts

Impact of Leverage on Cash-on-Cash Returns

J Scott
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
ModeratorPosted

In the spirit of truly understanding some important concepts behind investing decisions many of us are making, I wouldn't to start this thread...

Basically, I was surprised at the information I'm about to provide (I did this analysis in another thread a couple days ago and got some unexpected results), and figured a couple of you may be surprised as well.  At least for me, it will impact some decisions I make down the road...

Assume a rental property that generates 2% of its cost in monthly rent and that operates at a 50% expense ratio (actually, expenses + rent loss + capex).  Further, assume the property is leveraged somewhere between 0% (all-cash, no leverage) and 100% (fully leveraged at all-in acquisition cost).

The following graph plots two curves -- one representing a typical conventional loan amortization/rate and the other representing a typical portfolio loan amortization/rate -- with leverage amount indicated on the X-axis and it's resulting cash-on-cash return indicated on the Y-axis:

What I see in this graph:

  • Below 60% leverage, CoC is basically flat, without much opportunity for leverage to impact CoC, regardless of type of loan
  • Between 60-80% leverage, amortization/rate of the loan will determine whether you can start to increase your CoC or not
  • Above 80%, any positive leverage will greatly increase your CoC, but the amortization/rate will play a HUGE role in the extent of the increase

The key takeaway for me is that, for lower amounts of leverage, conventional versus portfolio loans make no difference -- and, in fact, leverage doesn't make much of a difference at all. For medium amounts of leverage (60-80%), there is a big difference in CoC based on type of loan chosen. And for larger amounts of leverage, both loan choices are good, but conventional terms/rates are very beneficial.

There are some obvious implications here (for me, at least) in terms of:

  • Whether I would even want to leverage at lower percentages, given the paperwork, DTI hit and loan costs
  • What types of loans I would pursue based on the amount of leverage available
  • The value of using the small amount of conventional loans available to their best advantage

Anyway, thought the results were interesting, and thought I would post them...enjoy!

Loading replies...