Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Land & New Construction
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago, 03/24/2015

User Stats

8,794
Posts
4,381
Votes
Bryan Hancock#4 Off Topic Contributor
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
4,381
Votes |
8,794
Posts

Recognition Of Partnership Values On PFS

Bryan Hancock#4 Off Topic Contributor
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
Posted

I was wondering what method folks use to value their in-process partnerships on deals they're working on when they submit their PFS to lenders. Things have become quite complicated to account for lately with all of the projects I have going so I have begun reporting a range of net worth values. My accountant gave me some pointers on this, but these items obviously aren't GAAP perfect or anything. I am reporting:

1. Contributed equity to project as the "conservative value" that falls in line with the rest of my PFS

2. An average of contributed equity and recognition of full pro rata value as an "intermediate valuation"

3. Recognition of full pro rata value as an "aggressive valuation"

Ideally the pro rata value would be cash contributed as a percentage of overall project costs, but our projects have long lead times with city delays so I have tried to recognize things based more on project duration, which seems more accurate and fairer.

Any thoughts or comments? What method do you use? Getting perfect statements for each submission to a lender would be quite expensive so I was wondering if other people have used similar methods or perhaps something that is better.

Loading replies...