Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

10,252
Posts
16,111
Votes
Steve Vaughan#1 Personal Finance Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • East Wenatchee, WA
16,111
Votes |
10,252
Posts

Separating utilities, taxes. insurance from "rent"?

Steve Vaughan#1 Personal Finance Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • East Wenatchee, WA
Posted

In light of the CDC eviction moratorium for non-payment of 'rent', is there a way to segregate what is rent vs what are fixed costs like w/s/g from rent?  Speaking of multi's mostly.  In my area w/s/g is owner-paid. 

For instance a $900 apt rental might break-down like this on the lease / rental agreement: 

Consideration:  Rent =$800;  W/S/G= $100.  Total = $900.

If separating w/s/g is ok, how about taxes and insurance?  Take same above but rent could be $500, w/s/g $100, taxes $250 , insurance $50.  A double N lease if you will.  Fixed op costs only, provable.

We've already  moved to MTM agreements only. Holding over doesn't seem to be as protected. Because state and federal eviction moratoriums apply to non-payment of rent, how can we reduce the amount of 'rent' being charged? 

Any thoughts from legal minds?  @Jerry W.  @chris K  @Ashish Acharya  Much appreciated!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

145
Posts
180
Votes
Rich S.
  • Central, MN
180
Votes |
145
Posts
Rich S.
  • Central, MN
Replied

Great question and idea.  I'm very interested to see responses to this.  

Loading replies...