Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago, 08/27/2018

User Stats

129
Posts
51
Votes
Sean Kollee
  • Investor
  • calgary, alberta
51
Votes |
129
Posts

Expensive market portfolio building - a brief summary

Sean Kollee
  • Investor
  • calgary, alberta
Posted

Building a rental portfolio sounds easy when listening to a podcast or reading a blog article where the investor has accumulated dozens of units all at 1% rule multiples.  But what to do in a market where you want to grow a portfolio, but rents in are only a fraction of what is needed to even cover the cost of a property, and cashflow is a distant fantasy?  How can a person even begin to progress toward financial independence when a fixer upper bungalow that costs a half million in cash only rents for $1500/mo?  

This is a case study of a project in Calgary, AB, Canada's fourth most populous city, (1.25 million), where the market is based on appreciation and not cash flow, and by any metric, real estate is highly overvalued.  Numerous strategies were deployed to create a workable deal.

Here is a a fairly different BRRR strategy than is generally pursued by investors;

1.  The buy - An old shack on a prized piece of land in a good inner city location was purchased, price, $455k.  With hindsight, this proved to be an excellent deal, and is no longer possible to acquire today at this number.  Land of this nature trades hands today at up to $15k/ft of frontage.  This deal, bought at the bottom of a recession cycle sold at $10.8k/ft of frontage. 

2. The first R is rezone.  A land use re-designation was earned after a favourable vote by mayor and council, at a public hearing, following lots of animosity and community opposition from the usual NIMBY's.  The end result is a zoning change from permission to build a single or semi detached home, into the highest possible low density residential use, a rowhouse project.

3. The second R is redesign - A quality architecture firm is engaged to come up with a 'build to lease' model of rowhouse.  Not just a capable firm with the creative and technical skill, the design shop also has the experience to ease its way the tricky approval process, overcoming numerous hurdles along the way.  Too much detail to go into here, but it was not easy.

4. The third R is rebuild.  This is a challenging process involving significant engineering (civil, structural, fire safety), city obstacles typical of highly liberal and intrusive government departments, difficult site conditions, rigorous inspections and many upfront costs.  By the time the project was complete, upwards of $100k is spent simply on compliance.  That really hurts.  A large degree of experience and know-how is leveraged to get the build finished in a timely manner and on a reasonable budget.  There is no way to do this on a low budget, typical of a jurisdiction where many fingers are dipping far too deeply in the construction budget.

5. The fourth R is Rent.  After eight months of difficult grunt work, the project comes together.  Units are found to be very easy to rent, and a wait list of interested parties ready to put up lease deposits is secured. By project completion, all units are leased to quality tenants.  The overall project takes two years to manage, the first 16 months is spent on the political process of the zoning change and a complex development/building permit.  Cost of this is a real burden, and the existing home was demolished (condemned).

Summary - The project is now ready for the next two 'R's', the refinance and the repeat.  The success of the project is exceptionally rewarding, the outcome of the building is fantastic and the long term viability of the investment appears secure.  Total project cost is in the $1.45M range, monthly gross rents approximately $9k.  These are very good numbers in the market, not great compared to the US midwest for cashflow, but hard to compete with in Calgary. 

exterior detail

Interior decorations

This is the outcome my first major build to lease project.  Many investors wonder about the cost and difficulty in building these units.  In my view, armouring new units to rent is a smart way to build, especially in comparison to buying overvalued existing 50 year old buildings with costly cap ex needed.  This new build has many features simply not possible to achieve in a rehab.  

In a high cost city such as Calgary, construction costs can balloon into a major problem.  I'd estimate the cost of this build at somewhere around $145/CDN/ft or $110/US/ft.  These costs include the garage, landscaping, design, and even soft costs.  My advice would be for first time investors to avoid this type of project unless the local building conditions are fairly relaxed.  Cold climate building costs are much higher than in many US states, plus the new utility hookup costs when building in established areas are huge.  As stated before, expect to burn through $100k in non-construction related costs and fees.  

Loading replies...