Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago, 03/12/2018

User Stats

6
Posts
0
Votes
Pat Foy
  • Seattle, WA
0
Votes |
6
Posts

Section 8 subsidies dilemma.

Pat Foy
  • Seattle, WA
Posted

I am looking to purchase a 50 unit multi-family property that has nearly all renters on Section 8 subsidies. The seller has provided the rent rolls and previous year (2017) Income Statement. I noticed that the expenses of this property are 80% of the gross revenue (yes, eighty percent!). The reason for this I have discovered is because the property has a live-in manager and 2 staff, which accounts for a large portion of the expenses. At the current state the property does not cash flow. Now if I am able to reduce the expenses to say 50%, by replacing resident management and staff with external property management, the property will cash flow nicely.

However here lies the rub: in order to maintain the Section 8 subsidies there is apparently a budget which gets submitted to the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), which accounts for all these expenses in their calculation of the Section 8 subsidies. So if I reduce the expenses to get the property cash flowing I will get penalized by the HUD who I am told will account for these reduced expenses thus reducing the Section 8 subsidies I receive, possibly cutting rental income by about 70% !!

Does anyone out there in the BP universe have experience with this dilemma and perhaps have advice and/or a work around?

Thanks.

Loading replies...