Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

550
Posts
249
Votes
Dave Rav
  • Summerville, SC
249
Votes |
550
Posts

Regular maintenance options for 80-unit

Dave Rav
  • Summerville, SC
Posted

Hey group!  Wanted to ask about ideas for keeping up with regular maintenance on an 80-unit apartment building in SC.  We are currently vetting the property for purchase.  Accurately capturing the maintenance expense is of importance.

Property is actually comprised of 3 buildings next to each other (centrally located).  Age is 1970, but about 35% of the units have been renovated within last 2 years.  This includes new HVAC, some plumbing, kitchen upgrades, and cosmetics.  I do not believe any roofs have been replaced.  

Primary questions are:  Employ a small team of gen maintenance handymen?  Employ a maintenance sup and hire a few part-time folks to assist?  Other ideas?  Any feedback is greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

Loading replies...