Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5
Posts
0
Votes
Nikhil Paul
  • Toronto, Ontario
0
Votes |
5
Posts

Question about Promote/Carried Interest

Nikhil Paul
  • Toronto, Ontario
Posted

Not sure if this is the right place to post this but I didn't see an "Equity" section in the forms.

First a few example numbers: Say the property is $1,000,000 with 30% down, so $300,000 equity required @ 8% hurdle.

So this question is in relation to promote/carried interest. I know of the typical promote/carried interest used in RE/PE where say an 80/20 split is on the profits above the hurdle rate. But in the BP podcast 324, the guest spoke about taking the carried interest at the start. I.e, If he raised $300,000 for the downpayment, he took 20% off the start for "sweat equity", search costs, etc. (so he gets $60,000 right off the bat and LPs are left with $240,000 of what they invested) and the cash flows get distributed at the 20/80 split. 

Is this common? Why would anyone do this? Seems like the LPs are giving up a tremendous amount if the give up equity at the get-go.

Loading replies...