Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 years ago, 11/04/2021

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
David Thomas
  • San Francisco, CA
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Why don’t people invest in groups?

David Thomas
  • San Francisco, CA
Posted

Hey everyone, I’m just getting started investing in real estate and I really want to understand why people aren’t investing in groups of 3 or more. I’m posing this question to investors of all types: short-term or long-term, residential or commercial, etc. There has to be a reason or reasons why more people don’t do this. I’ve gathered my thoughts below:

Clearly there are upsides to investing in a group:

  • Lower entry cost. Whether it’s an even split or some sort of equity agreement, the group members get access to an asset they otherwise may not have been able to afford.
  • Shared workload. Tasks like accounting, maintenance contracting, etc. can be divided amongst the group members so that they can put less time in or stick to their strengths. If one of the members doesn’t have a lot of experience it gives them the opportunity to learn from the others.
  • Less risk. The less you invest the less exposure you have if the property takes a turn for the worst. If you’re invested in, say, 3 properties for ⅓ of the price, you’re much more risk averse.
  • Scale. With a smart investment and proper use of leverage, investing with groups could give you the opportunity to scale earlier and faster than you would have on your own.

But, like with any group project, problems arise:

  • Finding partners. There aren’t any surefire ways to bring a good group of investors together. You’re also probably not going to invest with multiple groups. For example, 3 groups of 5 people: You would have to work with 12 individuals to acquire, manage, and exit (maybe) on just 3 properties.
  • Theft. Anything that involves moving money has the inherent risk of theft.
  • Dishonesty. Finding a group of people that has a compatible set of contributions is hard enough, what if they aren’t all that they say they are?
  • Legal work. Setting up a group investment is a small challenge legally but can be costly. A proper governance structure needs to assign responsibilities, cover every possible exit scenario, and more.

I imagine I haven’t covered anywhere near everything, which is why I’m here. If you have experience investing with a group, what was the best part? Worst? If you’ve considered it, but chose not to, why? What was the biggest reason? Thanks!

Loading replies...