Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

171
Posts
49
Votes
Cameron Ellis
  • Investor
  • Memphis, TN
49
Votes |
171
Posts

Buy and Hold in Detroit? Your Opinion

Cameron Ellis
  • Investor
  • Memphis, TN
Posted

does anyone think Detroit and its surrounding areas will recover.. Right now I am looking on zillion and the prices for these homes are crazy! I just seen a home for sale for $1,300 that sold for $160,000 in 2008.. In real good condition, would it be a great place to hold properties since their residents are wanting to purchase?

Please give your opinions on this

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

358
Posts
306
Votes
Tom A.
  • Investor
  • West Bloomfield, MI
306
Votes |
358
Posts
Tom A.
  • Investor
  • West Bloomfield, MI
Replied
Originally posted by Ali Boone:

The problem with Detroit, aside from it's consistent declining population, is the tenants. I know too many investors who have had so many expenses due to meth labs and non-paying tenants that you would end up actually paying out on that $1300. That's bad. It doesn't go for all areas of Detroit of course, as I'm sure there are plenty of nice areas, but it does go for any area with $1300 houses.

Michigan is extremely tenant-friendly, meaning it can take forever to get rid of bad tenants, all the while you are not collecting rent from them and paying out on their misbehaviors.

Detroit meth labs? No. Other drugs, sure but Detroit isn't a meth lab city or a meth user city. Got to go to the sticks for that.

I've never even heard of a contaminated meth lab house in Detroit. A quick check of the DEA's National Clandistine Laboratory Register shows about 1000 meth houses in Michigan since 2004. It lists just one meth house in the city of Detroit, back in 2008. http://www.justice.gov/dea/clan-lab/clan-lab.shtml

I also don't agree with the description of Michigan as an extremely tenant-friendly state. It's really more down the middle. Some courts and some judges may be more tenant-friendly or more landlord-friendly but getting an eviction isn't hard.

I'm sure there are some horror stories, but this is a good example why investors need to really know where they're investing lest they believe things are better (or in this case, worse) than they really are.

Loading replies...