Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago, 09/07/2020

User Stats

106
Posts
32
Votes
Corey M.
32
Votes |
106
Posts

Renting out Primary residence - tax implications

Corey M.
Posted

As noted in another post, I'm considering renting out my LA condo, which will be cash flow negative in the range of $500/mo. I bought the house for $320k with 20% down, did a cash out refi recently and got a new $420k loan. That means there's about $230k in equity left in the home. 

If I rent it out, it'll be at around $3k/mo, but with all expenses, it'll cost me $500/mo, so I'll be losing $6k year in cash. Assuming the property conservatively appreciates by 3%/yr, does this move make sense over a turnkey (not that I only want a passive investment) with an ROI of about 17% (including cash flow, appreciation, and house paydown)?

My understanding is that I can no longer get the $250k cap gains exclusion if I move out and don't live in the place in three years. But what if I want to keep this as a long term rental property and sell it in a decade? Am I out of luck and have to pay taxes on what would've been a $250k exclusion? To me, renting out the primary residence only makes sense if I can do it for the long term, especially when housing prices could drop 10-20%+ in one year (like they did around 2007 in LA). 

Assuming I can afford to lose $6k/yr on the negative cash flow, is turning this into a longterm rental going to be a bad decision if I don't plan on selling it within three years? Is there any way to hold onto that $250k exclusion if it's a long term rental? 

Loading replies...