Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago, 12/02/2019

User Stats

151
Posts
96
Votes
Sebastian E.
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Berkeley Springs, WV
96
Votes |
151
Posts

Is it wrong for a city to tear down someone's house?

Sebastian E.
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Berkeley Springs, WV
Posted

I am not sure if anyone outside of the Baltimore area is following the story of the city of Baltimore condemning and knocking down a citizen's home. The story is that they condemned the property 6 days after they put the notice up and there was also an alleged lack of communication on the part of the city with the owner about how the actual demolition would take place. You can read about the story here 

I would be interested to hear folks thoughts on the story. My understanding is that they offered this person a mortgage free home in exchange for a home that was structurally about to collapse. It is hard to see how that is a bad deal for the owner. Sounds like the city completely bailed them out of the fact their house had fallen into disrepair causing harm and danger to anyone who was in and around that property.

I would be interested to hear how folks from Baltimore think the issue of crumbling vacant properties should be handled. Has anyone heard any innovative, market driven way to solve the issue? @Ned Carey @Account Closed and any others. 

Loading replies...