Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago, 11/20/2019

User Stats

172
Posts
57
Votes
Ben Feder
  • Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
57
Votes |
172
Posts

Is it profitable to buy real estate that needs no improvement?

Ben Feder
  • Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
Posted

What if you decide to buy an apartment building that's already profitable, running fine, structurally and cosmetically up to date, and has good management? If you buy that type of apartment, or any other type of real estate for that matter, and it is already in good working order and a class "A" or "B" asset nothing really wrong with it, could I just take that and continue renting it out with the current management company, collect rents, and make good cash flow from the deal? Or does most profit come from fixing up real estate, improving profitability, etc.?

Loading replies...