Why I Avoid Investing in Michigan

Why I Avoid Investing in Michigan

Specialist · Paradise Valley, AZ · Member since 2018 · 3k+ posts · 2k+ votes

I only invest where property rights are respected, such as Arizona and Texas. Here is a clear example of why. If you are a prospective investor in Michigan, reconsider what you are doing. Things will only get worse in the future.

Property Rights

A Michigan Man Underpaid His Property Taxes By $8.41. The County Seized His Property, Sold It—and Kept the Profits.

A state law allows counties to effectively steal homes over unpaid taxes and keep the excess revenue for their own budgets.

Eric Boehm | 11.6.2019 7:40 AM

An 83-year-old retired engineer in Michigan underpaid his property taxes by $8.41. In response, Oakland County seized his property, auctioned it off to settle the debt, and pocketed nearly $24,500 in excess revenue from the sale.

Under Michigan law, it was all legal. And hardly uncommon.

Uri Rafaeli, who lost his property and all the equity associated with it, is just one of thousands of people to be victimized by Michigan's uniquely aggressive property tax statute. The law, passed in 1999 in an attempt to accelerate the rehabilitation of abandoned properties, empowers county treasurers to act as debt collectors. In the process, it creates a perverse incentive by allowing treasurers' offices to retain excess revenue raised by seizing and selling properties with delinquent taxes—even when the amount owed is miniscule, and even when the homes aren't abandoned or blighted at all.


https://reason.com/2019/11/06/...

0Reply
48 views

Most Popular Reply

Specialist · Grand Rapids, MI · Member since 2016 · 1k+ posts · 611 votes
6y

@Mike M.

I agree, don't invest in Michigan. I don't want more competition! Worst place ever!

See this reply in the discussion

5 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Austin, TX · Member since 2019 · 5k+ posts · 5k+ votes
    6y

    How many advanced notices of the $8.41 delinquency did he get and just failed to act on them for whatever reason though.

    This makes it seem like he made an error in filling out his check and they seized the property the next day.

  • Specialist · Paradise Valley, AZ · Member since 2018 · 3k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    6y
    Originally posted by @Scott Mac:

    How many advanced notices of the $8.41 delinquency did he get and just failed to act on them for whatever reason though.

    This makes it seem like he made an error in filling out his check and they seized the property the next day.

    The article doesn't say, but it is extreme to take someone's home for $8.41 nonetheless and they could at least give him anything above and beyond what he owed. I don't think even California or Illinois have done this. Not that they won't in the future, it's just that Michigan seems to be leading the parade on this.

  • Specialist · Grand Rapids, MI · Member since 2016 · 1k+ posts · 611 votes
    6y

    @Mike M.

    I agree, don't invest in Michigan. I don't want more competition! Worst place ever!

  • Lisa StewartBusiness Member
    Real Estate Agent · Grand Rapids, MI · Member since 2016 · 22 posts · 11 votes
    6y

    I disagree with you on investing in Michigan, it's a great market for investors based on the rental return you can get in an affordable city like Grand Rapids. However, I find it totally reprehensible that the government can take ALL of the sale proceeds in cases like this. There is something fundamentally wrong with this and it needs to change. They should only be able to take what is owed, plus their costs of recovery. Not a penny more! It's a purely greedy grab by government and it makes me uncomfortable.

  • Specialist · Grand Rapids, MI · Member since 2016 · 1k+ posts · 611 votes
    6y

    This is a really dense statement.  I have invested in multiple states including Texas and California and there are alot of bad laws everywhere.  It takes two years of being late to have this happen and while I agree it should not be massive profits, people pay their taxes because they know what will happen from hearing about it.  With that being said, I have kept up on this legislation and I imagine it will change within the next 1-2 years.  Some counties are obviously much quicker to jump on board than others as I had a client behind for 3 years on over 30 properties that never lost a home.  We just sold off that portfolio recently.  To say don't invest in an entire state that is the source of the largest freshwater source in the world while living in a state that quite possibly in 6 years will use it's largest fresh water source almost entirely due to overconsumption is really outlandish because of ONE law.  I have followed the latter immensely as I work for a nonprofit focused on clean water preservation worldwide and it would not surprise me if Michigan was shipping billions of dollars of water to Arizona in the next few years.  There are plenty of reasons not to invest somewhere but this article is an overreaction.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.