Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago,

User Stats

66
Posts
45
Votes
Andrew Brewer
  • Developer
  • Austin TX - San Jose, CA
45
Votes |
66
Posts

title insurance survey on a MHP

Andrew Brewer
  • Developer
  • Austin TX - San Jose, CA
Posted

I am negotiating to purchase a MHP in Northeastern Oklahoma. A provision in the contract states that buyer will pay for title insurance and a title insurance survey. I've never encountered a title insurance survey provision before, although i've only ever bought/sold residential homes. I've heard that sometimes ALTA surveys can be close to 20k.

Is an expensive survey like this necessary for a commercial purchase like this? Is there a specific type of survey I should be looking for. I won't be looking to mine or extract natural resources, nor will I be trying to redevelop the land. 

Is it reasonable for the buyer to be responsible for the entire cost or should this be a seller cost or a split cost?

Loading replies...