Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Fritz Adrienne
  • Investor
  • New Kensington, PA
0
Votes |
3
Posts

Need help locating a law stating a buyer can not sue the seller

Fritz Adrienne
  • Investor
  • New Kensington, PA
Posted

I sold a house 3 years ago that I renovated.  The home inspector suggested that house could use a new roof, even though I had a roofing company provide a letter stating the roof has 10 more years of life expectancy (the roof overall was in pretty good shape).  The home inspector also recommended sealing valleys and flashing as routine maintenance in order to prevent leaks, which i did.  The buyer signed off on the disclosure that stated he would accept the home without a new roof.  3 months after the closing a small leak developed in the kitchen.  The buyer is now suing me for a brand new entire roof, and this case is even going to arbitration.  I found so many articles explaining why the buyer can not sue the seller, but can not find the exact law or statute stating this.  Does anyone know of a specific case (xxxxx vs yyyyy) that sets a precedence that buyers know of certain risks involved with purchasing a house (buyer beware).  The house is in Pennsylvania.  Thank you.

Loading replies...