Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

33
Posts
8
Votes
Ross Miller
  • Pottsville, PA
8
Votes |
33
Posts

Seller withholding sec deposits as "fines" and not transferring?

Ross Miller
  • Pottsville, PA
Posted

I'm a fairly new investor in the process of buying a 5 unit. This is my first multi-unit property, and it is also the first time I'm inheriting tenants. We are expecting to close in mid to late October. I am working with an agent that I've used before for SFRs, but I don't think she's done many multi-units. The seller is not really an experienced landlord. She never intended to own this property but actually bought it to bail out a struggling family member. 

As part of the seller's lease, if the tenants violate the lease, she keeps their security deposit. Two of her tenants do not yet know that they are losing their security deposits. She says that at closing, she will write me a check for the security deposits that will be in full, and I can ask the others to pay a security deposit at the start of my lease. Apparently my agent also advised that this was acceptable. 

Am I off base thinking that this is wrong? And I feel like my agent may have overstepped by claiming that this is okay. My thoughts are that if the tenants violated her lease, they should be paying her their fines, and the security deposits should remain in tact. I feel like I should receive the full security deposits at the time of closing. What if the tenants get mad when they find out they're losing their deposits and decide the trash the place and move out 2 hours after closing. Now I have no deposits to cover any damage. Even if they don't do that, now I have to chase tenants around to get security deposits. What if they don't have that much cash siting around - now I'm sending pay or quit notices already?

Just wanted to check with the more experienced folks before I call my agent.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,825
Posts
1,507
Votes
Brian Ploszay
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
1,507
Votes |
1,825
Posts
Brian Ploszay
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
Replied

You need to correct this right away.  Are you using a lawyer to close this deal?

When the building is sold, you will need all the security deposits back in full from her.  Any remaining tenant shall not have their security deposits deducted, unless there is an agreement in writing from Landlord and Tenant about the forfeiture.   The capturing of the security deposits will be when these tenants will leave.  But the event didn't happen on your watch.  

At the end of the day, calculate how much this issue is.  It might be fairly minor.  If this is a good enough deal and you don't want to rock the boat, just eat the cost and make the deposits whole.   Else, fight for this issue.  

Your agent probably didn't give you the best advice, but that's okay.  You got it now.  Use your attorney to modify this contract.  Or strongly request this yourself.

Loading replies...