Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago,

User Stats

9
Posts
3
Votes
John Smith
  • New Philadelphia, OH
3
Votes |
9
Posts

Down (3.5% v. 10%) PMI, Liquidity, Gains, Taxes, Projections

John Smith
  • New Philadelphia, OH
Posted

Have been reading forums & listening to podcast for over a year. Focused on cash flow & so on multi-families in part because of Bigger Pockets. Bought our 1st property last spring ($94,000 3-unit, using conventional mort w 25% down, with $1,650 in rents).  This might be my first question here. 

Now buying second property ($170,000 4-unit, using owner-occupied FHA mortgage). Trying to decide between FHA options, whether 3.5% down with 30 years of PMI or 10% down with only 11 years of PMI. My 11-yr projections of course favor 3.5% down, as the PMI is a push over 1st 11 years & the 3.5% down allows us to keep $11,044 in our IRA & make gains over that period. Now, my 30-yr projection of course favor 10% down, as eliminating 19 years of PMI plus the possibility of making gains on those savings is huge. However, due to the gains made by leaving money in our IRA initially & avoiding taxes on IRA withdrawal, the 3.5% down option is far more competitive than expected, in terms of a basic projection. And when I consider liquidity, the possibility of a refi, the possibility of high inflation, the possibility PMI will remain tax deductible, & such, it seems the 3.5% option is slightly superior. I am especially attracted to the liquidity advantage.

Any advice regarding my assumptions, calculations, or reasonings will be appreciated. Thanks!  

Price: $169,900

Interest rate: 3.75%

PMI: $115 per month

Down 3.5%: $5,947

Down 10%: $16,990

Taxes to be paid on IRA withdrawal required to cover 10% down, assuming 25% tax rate: $2,761

PMI over 11 years: $15,180

PMI over 30 years: $41,400

Gains assumed to be 5% annually (e.g. money left in IRA, money saved by avoiding tax penalty, money saved by not paying PMI)

*Have not factored in inflation, taxes beyond the initial taxes paid on IRA withdrawal, or the penalty on IRA home-buying withdrawal over the $10,000 allowance.

*If PMI is tax deductible over life a mortgage, then 3.5% will perform better, but there is no way to know whether it will retain its status.

Projection (11-yr) = 3.5% down beating 10% down by $18,066

Projection (30-yr) = 10% down beating 3.5% down by $28,864

Loading replies...