Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5
Posts
0
Votes
Eric K.
  • San Diego, CA
0
Votes |
5
Posts

Single Buy & Hold in San Diego or Multiple Properties Elsewhere?

Eric K.
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

Hi BP Family, I've been reading through the forums for over 4 months before posting for the first time. I am originally from Chicago, and have been living in sunny San Diego since 2007. The wife and I have been fortunate to purchase our first SFH in 2010, and needless to say its appreciated to ridiculous levels.

Based on reading countless posts and BP podcasts, I've decided on the BRRRR strategy as the best approach moving forward with RE investing. I wanted to ask the experts here on BP (yeah I'm talking to you!) on your opinion with buying a multifamily property (2-4units) in San Diego, vs buying several multifamily properties in a less expensive area. The initial goal would be to maximize cash flow, with a target of $500 per door. Since I'm familiar with the Midwest area, my first thoughts would be to consider that as the less expensive option, but im always open to suggestions.

San Diego

PROS: High cash flow and very high appreciation. Population growth. Low vacancy. Rapid rent increases. Local, and can rehab and self manage initially.

CONS: Difficult to scale and will postpone purchasing additional properties for a few years. Neighborhood would be C/C-. Likely tenant issues associated with neighborhood. 2% rule would be between .8 to 1%.

Less Expensive Area (example Midwest)

PROS: High Cash Flow. Easier to scale with multiple properties. Neighborhood B-/C+. Presumed more dependable tenants. Contractor network already in place. On paper, 2% rule looks possible. 

CONS: Low to no appreciation. Population flat or declining. Slow rent increases. Higher vacancy rates. Need to remotely manage or hire property manager.

Would love to hear your thoughts, and what YOU would choose. 

Thanks,

Eric

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,112
Posts
635
Votes
Kevin Fox
  • Real Estate Agent
  • San Diego, CA
635
Votes |
1,112
Posts
Kevin Fox
  • Real Estate Agent
  • San Diego, CA
Replied

Hey @Eric K.

I think investing locally in San Diego is the wiser strategy, especially to begin with. 

The thing to keep in mind when asking this question is the final "R" of the BRRRR acronym - REPEAT.

While the lower cost of entry does allow you to have a larger number of properties, "scaling" is all about growing your total returns.

Although the total unit count might be lower, your total returns and the control you have over the project/process will be far greater. 

Another thing to keep in mind is that the tenant quality in San Diego is unquestionably better than just about anywhere else in the country. Even in our "lesser" neighborhoods, the current rental demand allows for owners who keep top market units to pluck top tier tenants.

Either way, I wish you the best of luck. Let me know if I can ever be of service to you!

  • Kevin Fox
  • Loading replies...