Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Anush P.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Coraopolis, PA
0
Votes |
2
Posts

70% Rules

Anush P.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Coraopolis, PA
Posted
Hello, I'm new to real estate investing and had a quick question: Does buying at 70% of retail house price always apply?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

100
Posts
58
Votes
Kory Thaut
  • Investor
  • West Linn, OR
58
Votes |
100
Posts
Kory Thaut
  • Investor
  • West Linn, OR
Replied

@Anush P. I personally don't think so, too many other factors at play.  If I can buy a house at 80% retail and the numbers still work out... well, the numbers still work our.  I think it's important to have a go to property analysis approach that works for you specifically and your goals / plan.  

I do mostly buy and hold and have had success that I am pleased with... and all w/out ever reaching the "2% rule".  

Loading replies...