Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

17
Posts
0
Votes
Alexandra Wright
  • Greensboro, NC
0
Votes |
17
Posts

Why are options even necessary?

Alexandra Wright
  • Greensboro, NC
Posted

Hi, so I'm looking to tie up a property but I'm short on capital right now, and don't want to put any money down in a non-refundable option until I've secured a tenant for the property. Is there any way that I can draft an offer to purhase contract contingent on securing financing and contingent on securing a tenant? I need to control the property somehow, because I don't want competitors or the tenant to take the deal out from under me. However, I want to make sure that if I can't find a tenant to lease the property to and the deal falls through, I won't be held liable or vulnerable to a lawsuit. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks :)

Loading replies...