Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago,

User Stats

75
Posts
19
Votes
Steve Wilmers
  • Grand Rapids, MI
19
Votes |
75
Posts

Location vs cash flow

Steve Wilmers
  • Grand Rapids, MI
Posted
Hey all, I'm curious to see what everybody thinks about the location of a property vs the cash flow it produces. A property I'm currently looking at could be considered the nicest house on the block, especially with the interior finishes. The cash flow is there, considerably higher than higher quality neighborhoods nearby. However, it's in an investor heavy area where many of the cheap houses are being gutted and turned into higher end finish rentals. The number of low income properties still substantially outweighs the refinished properties in the area. What risks are there in buying in lower income areas where redevelopment is slow, but still apparent? Thanks, Steve

Loading replies...