Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 10 months ago, 02/13/2024

User Stats

158
Posts
45
Votes
Jonn Vidal
  • Bel Air, CA
45
Votes |
158
Posts

Non-Conforming Residential/Commercial "Replacement" Cost in eyes of Prop Insurance UW

Jonn Vidal
  • Bel Air, CA
Posted

Anyone get a straight answer from property insurers regarding insuring improved property comprised of solely legal non-conforming buildings?

Some insurance companies have told me they don't insure LNC buildings cause 'replacement' wouldn't be a straightforward process, as there's usually no detailed record of such grandfathered buildings' layouts in the records to permit re-building following a fire, flood, quake, etc.

Others have said at least in while securing quotes, it's a non-issue.

Surely they both can't be correct!?