Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Scottsdale Austin Tuktoyaktuk
4,152
Votes |
4,205
Posts

Why John & Jane Smith Can't Afford To Buy A house - No, it isn't interest rates

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Scottsdale Austin Tuktoyaktuk
Posted

Don't blame everything on interest rates - It's because wages haven't kept pace

My wife and I bought our first house in Seattle in 1986 for $78,000. It was in a safe, desired neighborhood, post card view of downtown, view of Elliot bay and in the distance, Mt. Rainier. We paid the going 8% interest rate and our payment was around $700 PITI. I needed to make about $1,945 a month or $23,335 a year (okay, this was back in the ice age, but the interest rate is the same) ;-) I was well paid, making more than needed to buy the house, selling very large computers for a well known computer company. We could afford my wife always being a stay-at-home mom.

The house just sold for $1,200,000 at 8% interest and PITI about $9,330. An increase of 15 1/2 times.

So, if you use the lending industry average, 36% of your monthly income can go towards housing and you would need $25,917 a month income or make $311,000 a year to qualify.

This is particularly troublesome if you understand that 61% of people claim they are living paycheck to paycheck. There is no relief in sight for the average household.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,828
Posts
15,795
Votes
JD Martin
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
15,795
Votes |
9,828
Posts
JD Martin
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
ModeratorReplied
Quote from @Account Closed:

Don't blame everything on interest rates - It's because wages haven't kept pace

My wife and I bought our first house in Seattle in 1986 for $78,000. It was in a safe, desired neighborhood, post card view of downtown, view of Elliot bay and in the distance, Mt. Rainier. We paid the going 8% interest rate and our payment was around $700 PITI. I needed to make about $1,945 a month or $23,335 a year (okay, this was back in the ice age, but the interest rate is the same) ;-) I was well paid, making more than needed to buy the house, selling very large computers for a well known computer company. We could afford my wife always being a stay-at-home mom.

The house just sold for $1,200,000 at 8% interest and PITI about $9,330. An increase of 15 1/2 times.

So, if you use the lending industry average, 36% of your monthly income can go towards housing and you would need $25,917 a month income or make $311,000 a year to qualify.

This is particularly troublesome if you understand that 61% of people claim they are living paycheck to paycheck. There is no relief in sight for the average household.


 I get your point but you can't use a specific house to make that argument because neighborhoods, cities, states and even countries change in value and demand and desirability over time. If we pretend you had bought in Detroit, for example, instead of Seattle, there's a decent chance that you would need *less* income today than 35 years ago. There are a lot of Northern and Midwestern towns and cities that have experienced flat or reverse growth during the same period. 

The US has always been a mobile nation. People go where the jobs, climate, political theatre, culture, and other factors are more to their liking, and the places they leave behind often become the new affordable housing areas.

business profile image
Skyline Properties

Loading replies...