Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago,

User Stats

42
Posts
4
Votes
Sydnie E.
  • California
4
Votes |
42
Posts

70% rule

Sydnie E.
  • California
Posted
Hello BP, I'm new to investing and know that typically one would use the 70% rule to analyze a property . I trying to get a better understanding on why not using this format would mess up a deal. If a property is listed at 380,000 and if approved for 295,000 due to the condition of the property and putting 40,000 into the property brings the cost to 340,000. That would leave 60,000 in profit. Plus 15,000 for an agent if used. So we are looking at 45,000. Can someone explain why this would not be a good deal. I know it is very basic . I just want to see if their are exceptions to this rule. Thank you in advance.

Loading replies...