MHU boot camp and study materials, worth it ?

Question

I’m new to REI and while reading here came across MHP investing. While combing thru this MB forum posts I came across several folks recommending going to Mobile Home University to learn more about this investment. While there I saw that they have boot camp and lots of material to get a grasp on this subject. Their boot camp is $2000 and held 4 times a year. Next one is in Las Vegas sometime in September. I was wondering if it’s worth it to fork out $2k to get all the info I need to understand this business ? I’ve also started to listen to Frank Rolfe’s podcast to help me understand this niche.

Scott Schaar · Answer

@Manmath D. You’ll see huge returns on the small investment in the course. I was just at the one in Charleston SC. Good class if you’re just starting, or already an owner. The strategies you’ll learn are great. Literally cover everything from A to Z.

I had already bought my first park before attending. I did so following the MHU due diligence manual. It was a great resource for those of us that tackle a MHP with no prior experience.

You should at least do the home study course before looking into this niche.

The networking is great also. I’ve been talking to several of the park owners I met there.

Chris Pellicone · Answer

Highly recommended. You can learn a lot online but walking the parks is the hands on experience you need.He goes through the fixes needed. What he would do to make the parks you are looking at bette. Frank and Brandon are awesome. You may pay 2000 but you get so much material and Frank is a genuine teacher that I feel really wants to help you succeed. Worth the $.

Manmath D. · Answer

@scott schaar Thanks for the feedback. I've been debating all day if I should go to their bootcamp. Next one is in Las Vegas and not too far away. Frankly I only have 100k in capital. And I feel 3k (Entire trip expense) invested to learn at this bootcamp will help me use that capital wisely. I'm new to REI and trying to soak in as much as possible. Thanks again.