Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Questions About BiggerPockets & Official Site Announcements
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 15 years ago, 08/06/2009

User Stats

2,873
Posts
689
Votes
James Hiddle
  • Altus, OK
689
Votes |
2,873
Posts

Someone With High Negative Influences Should Be Banned

James Hiddle
  • Altus, OK
Posted

Members who have extremely high negative influences should be banned. If you have that high of negative influences that shows us you have no respect for the rules which in turn shoots your credibility down the tubes. Why should anyone trust anyone with that high of negative influences if you have no respect for the rules.

Therefore those who continue to break the rules should be banned just my opinion.

Loading replies...