Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Questions About BiggerPockets & Official Site Announcements
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 18 days ago,

User Stats

927
Posts
1,420
Votes
Stuart Udis
Pro Member
  • Attorney
  • Philadelphia
1,420
Votes |
927
Posts

Bigger Pockets Forum Suggestion

Stuart Udis
Pro Member
  • Attorney
  • Philadelphia
Posted

@Scott Trench & @Rene Hosman Have you considered implementing ways to verify identities of those who can post in the forums and perhaps even require full names? It will cut down on the fake accounts created to promote certain individuals, markets etc. When I receive inbox messages and the sender can't even keep their name consistent between signature and account name, you know its getting out of hand. I don't know how difficult of a task this would be, but suspect it would make for better quality forum content. 

  • Stuart Udis
  • [email protected]
  • Loading replies...