Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Real Estate Agent
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

13
Posts
4
Votes
Steve R.
  • Austin, TX
4
Votes |
13
Posts

Austin forbearance in July 2021

Steve R.
  • Austin, TX
Posted

Austin, Texas, ranks No. 1 for having the most people in financial distress. 75% homeowners in austin (https://wallethub.com/edu/cities-financial-distress/79863). does that mean in march-july 2021 Austin will face the most forbearance? (Those relief options allow borrowers to hit pause on their loans for a total of 360 days (two separate 180-day terms) that started in March 2020.)

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

636
Posts
485
Votes
Jacob Pereira
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Austin, TX
485
Votes |
636
Posts
Jacob Pereira
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Austin, TX
Replied

@Steve R., it's actually the 1-year change in number of people in distress that they're talking about, not the total number or per-capita number. One of my big problems with a lot of Wallethub's mass list business model is that they take some seemingly correlated (and often very poor) data and throw it together to publish a list, without really understanding the implications. 

Without knowing the details of this particular data, it seems to me that it's logical that in a town with a large service sector that was faring incredibly well last year and was hit hard by the pandemic that there would be a big increase, although my suspicion is it's from a low base, and mostly of those people who already didn't have a lot of financial assets. I think there's a lot more information needed to pull any kind of actionable conclusions from what was offered here.

Loading replies...