Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago,

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Randy Webb
  • seattle, wa
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Seattle REI Newbie

Randy Webb
  • seattle, wa
Posted

Hi all, I've been lurking on the forums here for a few months and have a question about cash flow.

I want to buy a 2-4 unit near downtown Seattle and owner-occupy one of the units. My plan is to use a 3.5% down FHA loan to do this. However, the market here appears to be such that I won't be able to get anything in my target area to cash flow (Capitol Hill-ish, for you locals). Monthly rents are about .5% of the asking prices around here.

Would it make any sense to get into a deal that is cash-flow negative even in the best case scenario? I suppose my goal in doing so would be to build equity rather than for income. Rents are skyrocketing in my area and I'm really just trying to have a net housing cost that is less than what I would be paying for a similar quality rental. As long as the negative cash flow is within that range I feel like I can justify this.

Does this make sense? Or am I thinking about this the totally wrong way? Thanks in advance for any help.

Loading replies...