Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

19
Posts
3
Votes
Mehmet Eksik
3
Votes |
19
Posts

More equity or less money down on my first purchase ?

Mehmet Eksik
Posted
I am buying my first property for rental income . It is 4-plex . I have couple finance options. The first one Is putting %10.5 down 4.62 interest rate no seller concession . So I am paying 37K out of my pocket with %10.5 equity . The second one is %5 down %5 intest rate with 3 percent seller concession total 21K down but only having 3% equity . With the second option my cash and cash return higher but my cash flow is $210 lower per month . And I feel I am wasting money for having only %3 equity. Which route should I take , any input would be helpful .

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

13,926
Posts
12,725
Votes
Replied

Easy decision. Your cash is buying cash flow, the property is not generating cash flow on it's own. It will take 6.6 years @ $200/month to break even on your own cash. That is not wise investing. To test if a property is a good investment run your numbers with 100% financing. That will tell you want the property will generate in positive cash flow. If you need to put in cash then the property itself has negative cash flow and is a poor investment. This excludes areas like CA whidch is primarily faith investors.

Ideally you want the minimum amount of your own cash sitting dead in a property that will produce a descent amount of positive cash flow on it's own merits. You never want to buy cash flow unless all you care about is bragging rights with other investors. Investors that buy with cash or pay down mortgages are deluding them selves into believing they have a property that produces high positive cash flow. They don't. There is a distinct difference between investing in real estate that produces cash flow and using their own cash to buy that cash flow. If all a investor wants is cash flow there is no reason to run the numbers, every property will do that by paying cash.

Buy with minimum down and save your cash for the next one if you are still growing. If you have all the properties you want pull all your equity and invest in a income fund. Diversify, you should easily earn 10% on it long term.

Loading replies...