Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 16 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

204
Posts
15
Votes
Dave Versch
  • Murray Hill, NJ
15
Votes |
204
Posts

Tax advantages?

Dave Versch
  • Murray Hill, NJ
Posted

Hi. I am just getting started as a real estate investor. I am about to close on a single family property which I'm paying 39K for. There's a Section 8 tenant who pays $675 per month. I'm using my HELOC on my residence to pay for the property. I'm anticipating about $225-$250 per month cash flow after all expenses and debt service. My question is, what are the tax advantages involved? I understand I can depreciate the property value to offset capital gains I might have in stocks (not this year :cry: ), and that I can deduct the interest on my HELOC. Anything else?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

15,749
Posts
10,947
Votes
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
10,947
Votes |
15,749
Posts
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
ModeratorReplied

Did you listen to the correct week Rich?
Week of Oct. 23, 2008, second segment. Mark explained the three IRS categories: Passive investor, active investor, and RE professional (also known as dealer). If you listened to the correct week, you would certainly have heard this.
One of the potential negatives is that you could incurr self-employment tax on your RE transactions. Now there are strategies to assist you here, but my point was ONLY to say that it may, or may not be beneficial for an individual investor to be classified as a RE pro as classified by the IRS.
This classification has nothing to do with "being in the business" or not. All three categories involve being in the business of RE investing. Each has its own advantages or disadvantages as the case may be, for each individual. If your CPA and you have decided that you will benefit most from the highest classification, then great Rich.
I do not see where your choice to argue here is coming from. i merely pointed out that being classified as a RE professional in the eyes of the IRS may not be right for everyone, nothing more.

Each person should consult with their CPA/tax advisor to make the best plan that fits there goals and strategies. Wouldn't you agree?
By the way, if you are a RE pro, as class. by IRS, most of your income is derived from RE investments, not other ordinary income, and therefore, a classification of active investor is sufficient for you. You can have unlimited passive losses offset passive gains (RE income). The 25k limit is only for ordinary income. Perhaps you are just missing the actual rules and tax guidelines associated with these IRS classifications. Again, being an active investor rather than a RE professional does not mean that you are "not in the business".

Loading replies...