Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago, 02/25/2020

User Stats

4
Posts
3
Votes
Jamie Larson
  • San Francisco, CA
3
Votes |
4
Posts

1% Rule

Jamie Larson
  • San Francisco, CA
Posted

Hi!

First Post on Bigger Pockets:  I've heard about the 1% rule of charging 1% of the property's purchase price for monthly rent.   I've even heard about the rule being called a 2% rule.  I'm just getting started in researching real estate in the Bay Area CA and don't see investing in the area, while keeping that rule in mind is possible.  Even if you're looking out of the city, you can pay $1M for a duplex.  Does this rule mean that you won't make a profit unless you charge $5,000 per 2 bedroom/month?  That rental price is way too high. Why are people purchasing these buildings if they are nowhere near breaking even?

Jamie

Loading replies...