Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago,

User Stats

41
Posts
8
Votes
Michael Johnson
  • Investor
  • Austin, TX
8
Votes |
41
Posts

Subject-to vs. Loan Assumption

Michael Johnson
  • Investor
  • Austin, TX
Posted

This isn't an attempt to be an ***.  I'm honestly curious.  I've been looking over contracts, how to get them filled out, and what all the different things mean.  The standard contract form here in TX doesn't contain anything called "Subject-to".  In fact, I can't find the term anywhere in the contract.  When I do read it over, it seems what we're really doing is assuming the loan.

Please, someone, explain what the difference is.  I'm currently under the impression "Subject-to" or "Sub-to" is just trendy lingo, and largely confusing to people on the outside.  It's even confusing to people on the inside.  =-)

Thanks in advance.

Loading replies...