Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 month ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

20
Posts
13
Votes
Damon Albers
13
Votes |
20
Posts

tenants breaking leases and excessive damage make it hard to be profitable

Damon Albers
Posted

Hi, 

I have two houses that I purchased from Memphis Investment Properties (M.I.P.) who still manage them. Property one is a 3 bdrm 2 bath with a garage that rents for $1,350 and property two is a 3 bdrm 1 bath, driveway parking, that rents for $950.

Before I bought the houses, M.I.P., provided a proforma on each property. They allowed in the proforma for a 3% maintenance. The proforma's would have been accurate but, what they didn't allow for, is the turnover cost between renters that left excessive damage. Also, the vacancy rate was understated.  

My first house had a tenant in it when I bought the house and they just up and left and left the house in rough shape. Then my second house which was freshly turned had a tenant that up and left after a couple of months and caused excessive damage. 

On the first property, we sued and won a judgement of over $6,000 but I have not seen a penny and it's been over 18 months since the judgement. We sued on the second home but don't have a ruling yet. Now my first property currently has a tenant that is not paying rent, so we started the eviction process. I expect that I may have excessive damage on this home as well. 

Out of 4 tenants, only one has abided by the lease. 

Am I just unlucky or is this  what I can expect in this market? 

I was really excited to be a real estate investor but having 3 out of 4 tenants break leases and cause excessive property damage as well as unexpected turnover cost from excessive damage, is making want to get out.

Thank you for your any input you would like to share. 

Damon





Most Popular Reply

User Stats

28,055
Posts
41,046
Votes
Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
41,046
Votes |
28,055
Posts
Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
ModeratorReplied

The only people that win with turnkey investments are the turnkey companies. If these homes were such great investments, they would keep them for their own portfolio.

When you purchase an investment, calculate your returns based on actual performance. Forecasted performance is your best-case scenario and shouldn't be relied on, particularly in a tougher market like Memphis. 

  • Nathan Gesner
business profile image
The DIY Landlord Book
4.7 stars
165 Reviews

Loading replies...