Starting Out
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated 4 months ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bec07/bec0766c1730e150ae011ee95c8f5da785f9266d" alt="Ted Barrett's profile image"
Mortgage Rates Eating into Cash Flow Under 1% Rule
Hi all,
I've been trying to find updates of the 1% rule and whether it's working in 2024, specifically when you're using a mortgage at 80% LTV, 30-year mortgage. Looking at rates today, if I were to buy a property for $125k and have a $100k mortgage, the rate would be 6.25%, and with a 30-year mortgage, that's $7.5k of annual mortgage payment. Annual rent with the 1% rule is $12.5k. This means that mortgage payments eat up 60% of rent even before considering vacancy. This means the 50% rule fails now (50% + 60% = 110% --- 10% more in costs than rent), and other cost estimate methodologies seem to yield negative net cash flow.
Am I thinking about this correctly? Has anyone who has historically used the 1% rule modified it to accommodate current interest rates?
Thanks,
Ted
Most Popular Reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd272/cd2727839b553cee9d08721cc5d8eb99b3158b69" alt="Nicholas L.'s profile image"
- Flipper/Rehabber
- Pittsburgh
- 4,052
- Votes |
- 5,077
- Posts
your analysis is roughly correct. higher rates have crushed cash flow.
i never really used the rule to begin with. i just looked at lots of individual properties. i will also do a BRRRR if i can break even when i'm done and get 90+% of my cash back out.