Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

245
Posts
216
Votes
Darius Kellar
  • Real Estate Coach
216
Votes |
245
Posts

Amount of Units Does Not Necessarily Equate to More Profits or Portfolio Efficieny

Darius Kellar
  • Real Estate Coach
Posted

Many new investors are getting mis-leaded into thinking that the number of units someone has equates to more success. Please add additional comments to assist new investors with this topic.

Just because someone has 100 units does not mean they are running an efficient portfolio. It does not mean that they are doing better than the next person. It just means that they have 100 units. New investors should stick to more practical methods of investing in RE so more people have a greater chance of having a good start.

Connect with me on BP I am an open network

Loading replies...