Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 2 years ago, 12/13/2022

User Stats

144
Posts
55
Votes
Rob Bianco
  • New York City, NY
55
Votes |
144
Posts

Chicago - a good place for buy and hold?

Rob Bianco
  • New York City, NY
Posted

I'm not exactly a beginner; I have 30 units in Kansas City, but I'd really like to diversify my investing and I really enjoy the city of Chicago. Despite all the headwinds the city faces, I really believe Chicago is a big winner in 15-20 years to climate migration. I've looked at numerous properties online, inside the city and also in the suburbs, and the returns look OK on paper, but gosh, those property taxes seem to fluctuate wildly. I've heard some pretty horrible anecdotes about getting a bill that's anywhere from 20% to 120% higher and as an investor it's really hard to reconcile how that affects your investment and how investors react to that. 

I'm really trying to understand the investment strategy: Usually, in Kansas City, if my bills go up (tax/insurance) then I raise rent marginally to cover those costs. I try not to raise rents on good tenants if I don't need to, but in Chicago, if my taxes go up $100/month, do you just jack rent to meet those costs regardless of how good a tenant is? Is the thinking that someone will ultimately pay it, even if the tenant moves out? Do people find turnover to be high in the city? 

I grew up in NYC, so rents going up was never unexpected, even if it was $100-$200 per year, every year, and if you bought something in the year 2000, I imagine you'd have made a fortune if you still owned it in 2022 and I'm sort of hoping for a similar experience with Chicago. 
 

Half the people I talk to about Chicago say it's in a death spiral and the other half say it's a great city, and to come on down, the water is warm. 

Loading replies...