Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago,

User Stats

19
Posts
1
Votes
Matt Y.
  • Homeowner
  • Lodi, CA
1
Votes |
19
Posts

CA Capitol Gains

Matt Y.
  • Homeowner
  • Lodi, CA
Posted

So, I'm sure that this is going to reveal my "newb-ness" but I'm told there are no stupid questions. I thought we're in the trust nest, are we not?

As far as I know, in CA you must live in a purchase as your primary residence for a minimum of two years in order to avoid the stupid 30% CG's right?

Do you flippers out there just simply bite the bullet on this since you're still left with 70% of whatever you profited? Or are there tricks of the trade that I need to learn about? Are there at least some ways to help minimize this blow? Because I'd much rather only put say, 10% towards Obama's jetfuel/holiday fund if at all possible...

Loading replies...